AAO research
EB-1A leading or critical role — AAO decision OCT012019_02B2203: Appeal dismissed (p. 8). Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision OCT012019_02B2203: Appeal dismissed (p. 8). The Director found only one initial criterion; AAO withdrew published-material finding, found judging and display criteria met, but did not find three criteria overall. Awards, association membership, published material, leading/critical role and commercial success were not established; aggregate evidence did not show sustained acclaim. (pp. 1–8).
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | OCT012019_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | October 1, 2019 |
Classification / field stated in source | Singer and performing artist; vocalist in bands and performer in concerts/venues. |
Procedural posture | Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial; AAO dismissed. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed (p. 8). |
Final-merits status | No separate Kazarian final-merits determination because fewer than three criteria were established; AAO provided adverse aggregate review (p. 7). |
What the AAO decision addressed
The Director found only one initial criterion; AAO withdrew published-material finding, found judging and display criteria met, but did not find three criteria overall. Awards, association membership, published material, leading/critical role and commercial success were not established; aggregate evidence did not show sustained acclaim. (pp. 1–8)
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not met — source PDF |
Membership | Not met — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not met — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | met — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not coded — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not coded — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | not met |
High salary or remuneration | Not coded — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not met — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
pp. 1–8
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Good comparison with other performing musicians for limits of sales numbers absent comparison, judging school contests, display of performances, and distinguishing a leading role from a distinguished organization. Individual case page with exact holding and criterion-by-criterion source citations.
Editorial use note: Individual case page with exact holding and criterion-by-criterion source citations.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Leading or critical role research
Performance sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.