AAO research
EB-1A judging the work of others — AAO decision NOV302020_06B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision NOV302020_06B2203: Appeal dismissed. The source contains a material internal contradiction: p. 3 says the petitioner did not establish a third criterion and p. 7 says she “has established” major-significance contributions, while the conclusion says the initial threshold was not met. Contribution state is held as unclear pending legal/manual reconciliation. (pp. 3, 7, 10).
Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | NOV302020_06B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | November 30, 2020 |
Classification / field stated in source | Non-precedent EB-1A appeal by a cardiovascular researcher/medical doctor working in pulmonary hypertension, cardiovascular science, and mechanical circulatory-assist devices. (pp. 1–2) |
Procedural posture | AAO dismissed the appeal. It states the Director found two criteria—judging and scholarly authorship—met; AAO agreed, but found the three-criterion threshold unmet. (pp. 2–3) |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed. |
Final-merits status | No final-merits determination because the decision states the initial three-criterion threshold was not met. (pp. 2–3, 10); substantive outcome is held due to the contribution finding contradiction. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The source contains a material internal contradiction: p. 3 says the petitioner did not establish a third criterion and p. 7 says she “has established” major-significance contributions, while the conclusion says the initial threshold was not met. Contribution state is held as unclear pending legal/manual reconciliation. (pp. 3, 7, 10)
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not coded — source PDF |
Membership | Not coded — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not coded — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | met |
Original contributions of major significance | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | met |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | not met |
High salary or remuneration | Not coded — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
Source holds and limits
HOLD entire substantive summary: p. 3 says no third criterion; p. 7 expressly says contributions were established; p. 10 repeats insufficient initial criteria. Check whether source itself has a drafting error or missing page context before publication. Adverse, non-precedent.
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: If cleared for publication, create a decision-specific, page-cited summary that states the field and procedural posture, distinguishes criteria met/not met/not reached, links the USCIS source PDF, preserves redactions, and clearly labels the decision non-precedent. Potential comparison: Potential comparison for biomedical researchers on judging/authorship versus major-significance proof, but only after resolving the internal criterion contradiction; not safe for aggregation while held.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Judging the work of others research
Scholarly authorship research
Leading or critical role research
Medicine sector research
Threshold research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.