AAO research
EB-1A motions to reconsider — AAO decision NOV292023_01B2203: Motion to reconsider dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official…
Decision summary: AAO decision NOV292023_01B2203: Motion to reconsider dismissed. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | NOV292023_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2023-11-29 |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: Motion to reconsider prior EB-1A appeal dismissal; motion dismissed; citation_pages: 1; 2; 3; 4; classification: Motion to reconsider prior EB-1A appeal dismissal; motion dismissed; director_findings: See decision-specific basis; AAO findings distinguished from Director findings. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Motion to reconsider dismissed.', 'basis': 'AAO found the motion did not identify an incorrect legal/factual determination in the prior appeal. Prior decisions had found the petitioner’s team membership and social-media/published-material arguments insufficient to establish claimed criteria.', 'citation_pages': [1, 2, 3, 4]} |
Final-merits status | Procedural motion decision; no new merits determination. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Membership | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {'eligible_for_narrow_comparison': True, 'fit': 'Procedural-only baseball case; exclude from merits outcomes and criteria aggregation.', 'caveats': 'Nonprecedent, fact-specific decision; remands and procedural motions are not approvals. Exclude motion decisions from substantive merits aggregation. Older decisions require legal-temporal context.'}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Remand research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.