AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision NOV292006_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The AAO rejected the criteria discussed and concluded the petitioner did not establish sustained acclaim or the required threshold; appeal dismissed.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: The source is an AAO decision concerning an EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | NOV292006_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2006-11-29 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability (Form I-140) |
Procedural posture | Nonprecedent AAO appeal from denial of an EB-1A Form I-140. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | No separate formal final-merits determination is identified; the decision concludes on failure to meet the threshold criteria and statutory acclaim. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The AAO rejected the criteria discussed and concluded the petitioner did not establish sustained acclaim or the required threshold; appeal dismissed.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | |
Membership | Not met — p. 5 |
Published material about the person | Not met — p. 6 |
Judging the work of others | Not met — p. 6 |
Original contributions of major significance | Not considered — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | |
High salary or remuneration | Not met — p. 8 |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The petition concerns a business administrator/executive of a paper products company; the decision notes employment-history inconsistencies and continued work in the area.; evidence_pages: 2; 8; 9
claim: AAO rejected awards, association membership, published material, judging, authorship, leading/critical role, and high salary based on gaps in recognition, documentation, translation, role/reputation, and comparative pay evidence.; evidence_pages: 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8
claim: The record did not establish the threshold for extraordinary-ability classification; the appeal was dismissed.; evidence_pages: 8; 9
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Entrepreneurship sector research
Threshold research
Revocation research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.