AAO research
EB-1A membership — AAO decision NOV282014_01B2203: Appeal dismissed; petition denied. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed; petition denied The AAO’s operative order dismisses the appeal; the stated merits and procedural basis is summarized above with page citations.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: The source is an AAO decision concerning an EB-1A Form I-140 petition and discusses eligibility for that classification.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | NOV282014_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | November 28, 2014 |
Classification / field stated in source | AAO nonprecedent decision on a Form I-140 petition for classification as an alien of extraordinary ability under INA § 203(b)(1)(A) (EB-1A). |
Procedural posture | AAO appeal from denial of EB-1A Form I-140; petitioner seeks classification in the sciences and submitted additional evidence on appeal. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed; petition denied |
Final-merits status | The decision states that the petitioner did not establish at least three criteria; a separate final-merits determination was therefore not reached. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The AAO’s operative order dismisses the appeal; the stated merits and procedural basis is summarized above with page citations.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not considered — source PDF |
Membership | abandoned — p. 4 |
Published material about the person | abandoned — p. 4 |
Judging the work of others | met — p. 4 |
Original contributions of major significance | |
Scholarly authorship | |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not considered — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not considered — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The petitioner seeks classification as an alien of extraordinary ability in the sciences and held a postdoctoral fellow position.; evidence_pages: 2
claim: The director found judging and scholarly authorship; the AAO affirms those findings. Membership and published-material issues were abandoned on appeal.; evidence_pages: 4; 13
claim: The AAO finds original contributions not established and dismisses the appeal.; evidence_pages: 4; 5; 6; 7; 14
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Medicine sector research
Final Merits research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.