AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision NOV282012_01B2203: Appeal timeliness

AAO EB-1A decision NOV282012_01B2203: Appeal timeliness

EB-1A appeal timeliness — AAO decision NOV282012_01B2203: Current motion dismissed; prior AAO decisions affirmed; petition remains denied. Review source…

Decision summary: AAO decision NOV282012_01B2203: Current motion dismissed; prior AAO decisions affirmed; petition remains denied. The motion did not show the prior untimeliness ruling was erroneous, did not establish new facts or a legal basis for reopening, and failed the procedural requirements for an ineffective-assistance claim, including a detailed affidavit, notice to former counsel, and disciplinary complaint information.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: EB-1A source; in-scope as procedural motion only. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

NOV282012_01B2203

Decision date as printed

November 28, 2012

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A motion decision; motion dismissed and prior AAO decisions affirmed

Procedural posture

AAO had dismissed an earlier appeal and a prior motion to reopen on untimeliness; this decision addresses another motion to reopen/reconsider and ineffective-assistance assertions, not the underlying EB-1A merits.

Operative disposition

Current motion dismissed; prior AAO decisions affirmed; petition remains denied.

Final-merits status

not reached in this procedural motion decision.

What the AAO decision addressed

The motion did not show the prior untimeliness ruling was erroneous, did not establish new facts or a legal basis for reopening, and failed the procedural requirements for an ineffective-assistance claim, including a detailed affidavit, notice to former counsel, and disciplinary complaint information.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached
This decision did not decide this criterion. — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached
This decision did not decide this criterion. — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not reached — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Cover dates the redacted EB-1A motion decision November 28, 2012.; pages: 1

  • claim: AAO states the original appeal was dismissed December 1, 2010 and an earlier motion to reopen was dismissed May 14, 2012 as untimely.; pages: 2

  • claim: The current motion did not establish that the prior untimeliness finding was erroneous or supply an adequate basis for reopening/reconsideration.; pages: 2; 3

  • claim: The petitioner failed to provide required ineffective-assistance documentation, including an affidavit detailing former counsel’s agreement/actions, notice to counsel and opportunity to respond, and disciplinary-complaint information.; pages: 3; 4

  • claim: AAO dismissed the motion and affirmed the prior AAO decisions; petition remains denied.; pages: 4

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Not suitable as a merits SEO example; possible separate procedural-motion reference with identifying facts carefully limited.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Published material about the person research

  • Leading or critical role research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for NOV282012_01B2203