AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision NOV282005_12B2203: Published material about the person

AAO EB-1A decision NOV282005_12B2203: Published material about the person

EB-1A published material about the person — AAO decision NOV282005_12B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official…

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The petitioner did not establish qualifying published material, original contributions of major significance, artistic display/showcase, leading/critical role, or commercial success in the performing arts. The decision distinguished self-authored work from material about the petitioner, and visual-art work from performing-arts commercial success.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: The source is an AAO EB-1A petition appeal and provides decision-specific procedural and evidentiary analysis.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

NOV282005_12B2203

Decision date as printed

November 28, 2005

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition appeal

Procedural posture

Legacy EB-1A appeal; appeal dismissed after fewer than three criteria.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

Legacy decision; the AAO made an aggregate acclaim conclusion without a separate modern formal final-merits determination.

What the AAO decision addressed

The petitioner did not establish qualifying published material, original contributions of major significance, artistic display/showcase, leading/critical role, or commercial success in the performing arts. The decision distinguished self-authored work from material about the petitioner, and visual-art work from performing-arts commercial success.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not coded — source PDF

Membership

Not coded — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not met — p. 2, p. 3

Judging the work of others

Not coded — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 3, p. 4

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not met — p. 4

Leading or critical role

Not met — p. 4, p. 5

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not met — p. 5, p. 6

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The petitioner sought classification in the arts; the record describes visual/graphic art and animation work.; pages: 1; 2

  • claim: Self-authored work and product/movie credits were not published material about the petitioner in qualifying professional or major media; submitted coverage did not satisfy the regulatory elements.; pages: 2; 3

  • claim: Letters and descriptions of work did not establish field-wide impact or original contributions of major significance.; pages: 3; 4

  • claim: The record did not establish that the petitioner’s work was displayed at qualifying artistic exhibitions/showcases or that the role was leading/critical for distinguished organizations.; pages: 4; 5

  • claim: The commercial-success criterion applied to performing arts and was not established for the petitioner’s visual-art/animation work; supporting evidence did not establish qualifying receipts.; pages: 5; 6

  • claim: AAO dismissed the appeal and concluded the record did not show sustained acclaim.; pages: 6

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Published material about the person research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Major Significance research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for NOV282005_12B2203