AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision NOV272020_01B2203: Published material about the person

AAO EB-1A decision NOV272020_01B2203: Published material about the person

EB-1A published material about the person — AAO decision NOV272020_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official…

Decision summary: AAO decision NOV272020_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. AAO accepted published material and withdrew Director’s adverse distinguished-reputation finding on leading/critical role; it withdrew Director’s high-salary finding because compensation comparators were not comparable to executive role/total compensation. Fewer than three criteria; final merits not reached.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

NOV272020_01B2203

Decision date as printed

November 27, 2020

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability petition / AAO decision

Procedural posture

Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial of EB-1A petition; de novo review.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Final-merits status

Not reached_threshold_Not met

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO accepted published material and withdrew Director’s adverse distinguished-reputation finding on leading/critical role; it withdrew Director’s high-salary finding because compensation comparators were not comparable to executive role/total compensation. Fewer than three criteria; final merits not reached.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not coded — source PDF

Membership

Not coded — source PDF

Published material about the person

met
Coverage in Architectural Digest and home-decor publications. — p. 2

Judging the work of others

Not coded — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not coded — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

met
Independent evidence supported company reputation and leading role. — p. 2, p. 3

High salary or remuneration

Not met
Position-appropriate comparison and total-vs-base remuneration not established. — p. 3, p. 4

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source holds and limits

"Company names redacted and underlying accounting, media, payroll and comparator exhibits are not included."

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Articles in Architectural Digest and home-decor publications met published-material criterion; independent coverage and partnerships supported company’s distinguished reputation and leading-role criterion.; pages: 2; 3

  • claim: Salary comparisons matched marketing/sales roles rather than chief executive capacity, and compared total compensation to base wages; high salary criterion not established.; pages: 3; 4

  • claim: Because fewer than three criteria were met, no final merits determination; appeal dismissed.; pages: 4; 5

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion_with_careful_citations

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Published material about the person research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Entrepreneurship sector research

  • Final Merits research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for NOV272020_01B2203