AAO research
EB-1A withdrawal and mootness — AAO decision NOV262024_02B2203: Withdrawn; remanded for criterion analysis and possible final merits. Review source…
Decision summary: The AAO withdrawn; Remanded for criterion analysis and possible final merits. No criterion outcome or final merits decided.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | NOV262024_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | Nov 26 2024 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability. |
Procedural posture | Lead marketing specialist appeal; RFE/denial failed to explain or accurately characterize evidence. |
Operative disposition | Withdrawn; Remanded for criterion analysis and possible final merits. |
Final-merits status | not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
No criterion outcome or final merits decided.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | not reached |
Membership | not reached |
Published material about the person | not reached |
Judging the work of others | not reached |
Original contributions of major significance | not reached |
Scholarly authorship | not reached |
Artistic display or showcases | not reached |
Leading or critical role | not reached |
High salary or remuneration | not reached |
Commercial success in the performing arts | not reached |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
Inadequate explanation/mischaracterization; examples include leading role, membership, published material. (PDF p. 2)
Photocopies not categorically inadmissible; remand for criterion review and possible final merits. (PDF p. 3)
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Group only by narrowly described issue; do not conflate outcomes or treat remand as approval.
Editorial use note: Eligible for scoped, citation-rich content; identify procedural posture and nonprecedent status.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Final Merits research
Remand research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.