AAO research
EB-1A three-criterion threshold — AAO decision NOV252024_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision NOV252024_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_eb1a_decision_or_related_proceeding. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | NOV252024_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2024-11-25 |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial of Form I-140 EB-1A petition.; citation_pages: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; classification: Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial of Form I-140 EB-1A petition. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Appeal dismissed.', 'basis': 'The Director found the petitioner met at least three criteria, but the AAO’s nonprecedent decision focuses on final merits and does not enumerate which specific criteria were accepted. It found the totality did not establish sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing.', 'citation_pages': [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]} |
Final-merits status | Final merits was reached; the AAO found the total record, including awards, memberships, published coverage, judging and displayed artwork, insufficient to show a career of acclaim or top-of-field standing. The exact three threshold criteria are not identified in the decision. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Membership | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not considered — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not considered — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not considered — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not considered — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {'eligible_for_narrow_comparison': True, 'fit': 'Narrow visual-artist comparison on awards, association membership, press coverage, judging and exhibition evidence at final merits.', 'caveats': 'The exact three criteria credited below were not identified; do not assign them individually based on the evidence discussed in final merits.'}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Final Merits research
Coverage research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.