AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision NOV252013_02B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision NOV252013_02B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision NOV252013_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed Insufficient evidence under the claimed criteria, chiefly because translations were noncompliant and the record did not establish recognized awards, significant original contributions, or a qualifying leading/critical role. Membership was abandoned; authorship was not established on the submitted translations.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: Cover and discussion identify an EB-1A Form I-140 petition under INA §203(b)(1)(A).. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

NOV252013_02B2203

Decision date as printed

2013-11-25

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability in business

Procedural posture

AAO appeal of denial; appeal dismissed after finding fewer than three qualifying criteria.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

Do not synthesize the underlying asserted company history as adjudicated fact; describe only the AAO’s evidentiary findings and translation defects.

What the AAO decision addressed

Insufficient evidence under the claimed criteria, chiefly because translations were noncompliant and the record did not establish recognized awards, significant original contributions, or a qualifying leading/critical role. Membership was abandoned; authorship was not established on the submitted translations.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not met — p. 4

Membership

abandoned — p. 5

Published material about the person

Not met — p. 5, p. 6

Judging the work of others

Not considered — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 6

Scholarly authorship

Not met — p. 7

Artistic display or showcases

Not considered — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not met — p. 7

High salary or remuneration

Not considered — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The cover gives November 25, 2013 and identifies an EB-1A business petition for an e-commerce entrepreneur; the decision states it is nonprecedential.; pages: 1

  • claim: Most submitted Chinese-language evidence lacked individually certified translations; AAO treated the translations as non-probative under 8 C.F.R. §103.2(b)(3).; pages: 3; 4

  • claim: The award evidence did not establish nationally/internationally recognized awards; membership claim was abandoned on appeal.; pages: 4; 5

  • claim: Published material did not meet the criterion because translations and publication/outlet evidence were deficient; claimed original business contributions were not shown to be original/majorly significant.; pages: 5; 6

  • claim: Authorship was described conditionally as supportable only if compliant translations had been submitted; leadership evidence also failed the criterion.; pages: 7

  • claim: AAO concluded fewer than three criteria were established and ordered dismissal without a formal final-merits determination.; pages: 8

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Entrepreneurship sector research

  • Final Merits research

  • Waiv research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for NOV252013_02B2203