AAO research
EB-1A leading or critical role — AAO decision NOV162023_02B2203: Appeal dismissed (see cited pages). Review source status, procedural posture and the…
Decision summary: AAO decision NOV162023_02B2203: Appeal dismissed (see cited pages). Awards, memberships, published material, original contributions, and leading/critical role were not established. Judging was reserved because it could not change the failure to meet three criteria. (pp. 2–7).
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | NOV162023_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | November 16, 2023 |
Classification / field stated in source | Choreography, specifically flamenco dance and operation of a dance studio. |
Procedural posture | Appeal of Texas Service Center denial; appeal dismissed. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed (see cited pages). |
Final-merits status | Not reached as a formal separate final-merits determination because the initial threshold was not met; AAO said aggregate evidence did not establish required acclaim. (p. 7) |
What the AAO decision addressed
Awards, memberships, published material, original contributions, and leading/critical role were not established. Judging was reserved because it could not change the failure to meet three criteria. (pp. 2–7)
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not met — source PDF |
Membership | Not met — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not met — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not met — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not considered — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | not met |
High salary or remuneration | Not considered — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
(p. 3)
(p. 7)
(pp. 2–3)
(pp. 2–7)
(pp. 4–5)
(pp. 5–6)
(pp. 6–7)
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Useful choreography comparator on student awards versus choreographic excellence, studio reputation, and claims about original contributions. Individual case page; clearly distinguish explicitly denied criteria from judging reserved as unnecessary.
Editorial use note: Individual case page; clearly distinguish explicitly denied criteria from judging reserved as unnecessary.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Leading or critical role research
Performance sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.