AAO research
EB-1A appeal timeliness — AAO decision NOV132024_02B2203: Combined motions dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision NOV132024_02B2203: Combined motions dismissed. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | NOV132024_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2024-11-13 |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: Nonprecedent decision on a third combined motion to reopen and reconsider. AAO states a prior motion was received about one week after its filing deadline. The explanation that printing could not be completed on time did not establish a delay beyond the petitioner’s control. The current motion’s evidence addressed original petition deficiencies rather than the basis of the immediately preceding dismissal and did not overcome untimeliness.; citation_pages: 1; 2; 3; classification: third_combined_Motion dismissed_untimely_prior_motion_and_no_new_facts; director_findings: Nonprecedent decision on a third combined motion to reopen and reconsider. AAO states a prior motion was received about one week after its filing deadline. The explanation that printing could not be completed on time did not establish a delay beyond the petitioner’s control. The current motion’s evidence addressed original petition deficiencies rather than the basis of the immediately preceding dismissal and did not overcome untimeliness. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Combined motions dismissed.', 'basis': 'The prior motion was untimely and the explanation did not establish extraordinary circumstances beyond the petitioner’s control; the current motion did not address the prior dismissal’s dispositive basis.', 'citation_pages': [1, 2, 3]} |
Final-merits status | Not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {'fit': 'untimely_motion_and_relevance', 'aggregation_valid': True, 'use': 'Narrow procedural explainer on late motions and the need to address the immediately preceding dispositive ruling; avoid presenting the merits as freshly adjudicated.', 'do_not_claim': ['Do not characterize a procedural dismissal, rejection, or remand as approval or a completed merits adjudication.', 'Do not infer criterion outcomes beyond those expressly stated.', 'Do not treat explicitly nonprecedent decisions as binding authority.'], 'caveat': 'Use only the source’s narrow finding and cited pages; historical decisions require date/context disclosure.'}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Untimely research
Remand research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.