AAO research
EB-1A original contributions of major significance — AAO decision NOV122024_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the…
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The petitioner did not establish the initial three-criterion threshold. Claimed original contributions of major significance were not established; final merits was not reached.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: Complete identity-matched AAO decision concerning EB-1A extraordinary-ability eligibility.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | NOV122024_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2024-11-12 |
Classification / field stated in source | biochemist and researcher; EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition |
Procedural posture | Appeal from denial of EB-1A petition. AAO reviews original contributions and scholarly authorship evidence, finds the required three-criterion threshold unmet, and does not reach final merits. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | The petitioner did not establish the initial three-criterion threshold. Claimed original contributions of major significance were not established; final merits was not reached. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The petitioner did not establish the initial three-criterion threshold. Claimed original contributions of major significance were not established; final merits was not reached.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not considered — source PDF |
Membership | Not considered — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not considered — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not considered — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | |
Scholarly authorship | |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not considered — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not considered — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The petitioner is a biochemist who submitted scholarly articles, citations, and evidence of research funding.; pages: 1; 2
claim: AAO finds citation counts and citation percentiles do not establish that the work has influenced the field or constituted original contributions of major significance.; pages: 2; 3; 4
claim: Letters and publication evidence do not establish that the petitioner’s work changed the field or achieved sustained acclaim.; pages: 4; 5
claim: The initial threshold was not met; AAO dismissed without final merits.; pages: 6
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Medicine sector research
Threshold research
Final Merits research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.