AAO research
EB-1A remand — AAO decision NOV112005_22B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed for failure to identify specifically an erroneous conclusion of law or statement…
Decision summary: AAO decision NOV112005_22B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed for failure to identify specifically an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | NOV112005_22B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | Not stated in normalized review fields |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: The AAO summarily dismissed the appeal under 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v) because the petitioner or counsel did not identify specifically an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact; the appeal lacked responsive evidence or analysis.; citation_pages: 1; 2; classification: Summary dismissal; no specific error identified; director_findings: The Director determined that the petitioner had not established sustained national or international acclaim necessary for EB-1A classification; the AAO source does not give criterion-by-criterion findings. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Appeal summarily dismissed for failure to identify specifically an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact.', 'basis': 'The petitioner described organizing entertainment events and charity shows in Malaysian and Chinese communities, said the work had gained high recognition and the experience was rare in the United States, and asked to continue a career here. The submission did not address the denial with criteria-specific argument or evidence.', 'citation_pages': [1, 2]} |
Final-merits status | Not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {‘fit’: ‘Summary dismissal; no specific error identified’, ‘aggregation_valid’: True, ‘use’: ‘Aggregate only with summary-dismissal decisions sharing the no-specific-error procedural ground; retain differences in the appeal submission and any missed promise to supplement. May support an appeal-process explainer, but not substantive criterion guidance.’, ‘do_not_claim’: [‘Do not characterize a procedural disposition or remand as a final EB-1A merits determination.’, ‘Do not infer criterion-level findings from generalized denial language or aggregate counts.’, ‘Do not represent a remand as petition approval.’, ‘Do not treat a nonprecedent decision as binding authority.’], ‘caveat’: ‘The AAO did not review criterion evidence or final merits. The Director’s generalized sustained-acclaim conclusion is not an individual criterion finding.’}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Final Merits research
Remand research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.