AAO research
EB-1A appeal timeliness — AAO decision NOV112005_02B2203: rejection of untimely appeal. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision NOV112005_02B2203: rejection of untimely appeal.
Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_eb1a_procedural_record; not an AAO EB-1A criterion/final-merits decision.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | NOV112005_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | November 11, 2005 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability. |
Procedural posture | Vermont Service Center denial issued April 28, 2005; notice gave 33 days; appeal received June 1, 2005, 34 days after issuance. Director declined to treat the late filing as a motion and forwarded it. AAO rejects appeal as untimely. |
Operative disposition | rejection of untimely appeal |
Final-merits status | not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
rejection of untimely appeal
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | not reached |
Membership | not reached |
Published material about the person | not reached |
Judging the work of others | not reached |
Original contributions of major significance | not reached |
Scholarly authorship | not reached |
Artistic display or showcases | not reached |
Leading or critical role | not reached |
High salary or remuneration | not reached |
Commercial success in the performing arts | not reached |
Source holds and limits
["Can be grouped with other verified untimely appeal rejections as process guidance; avoid treating it as a merits decision.", "Any director-level criterion result is reported only as attributed background; it is not an AAO criterion determination."]
Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer
Can be grouped with other verified untimely appeal rejections as process guidance; avoid treating it as a merits decision.
Any director-level criterion result is reported only as attributed background; it is not an AAO criterion determination.
Source-cited findings recorded in review
p. 2 sets out governing deadlines and record dates; p. 1 identifies EB-1A petition and date.
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: May be grouped only with like procedural dispositions (summary dismissal for failure to identify error; untimely appeal; mootness after adjustment). Keep separate mechanisms and cite decision-specific sources.
Editorial use note: May be considered for a source-cited procedural reference entry after editorial review; do not frame as a substantive criterion precedent.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Summary Dismissal research
Untimely research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.