AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision NOV102005_07B2203: Withdrawal and mootness

AAO EB-1A decision NOV102005_07B2203: Withdrawal and mootness

EB-1A withdrawal and mootness — AAO decision NOV102005_07B2203: Appeal dismissed on withdrawal. Review source status, procedural posture and the official…

Decision summary: AAO decision NOV102005_07B2203: Appeal dismissed on withdrawal. Counsel’s withdrawal; order expressly says dismissed based on withdrawal.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

NOV102005_07B2203

Decision date as printed

2005-11-10

Classification / field stated in source

Classification not stated in the normalized review fields

Procedural posture

Procedural posture not separately coded in the normalized review fields. Consult the source PDF.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed on withdrawal.

Final-merits status

Not reached

What the AAO decision addressed

Counsel’s withdrawal; order expressly says dismissed based on withdrawal.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached
The document contains no criterion-level ruling. — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached
The document contains no criterion-level ruling. — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached
The document contains no criterion-level ruling. — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached
The document contains no criterion-level ruling. — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not reached
The document contains no criterion-level ruling. — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached
The document contains no criterion-level ruling. — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not reached
The document contains no criterion-level ruling. — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached
The document contains no criterion-level ruling. — source PDF

Source holds and limits

["No criterion analysis is present."]

Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer

  • No criterion analysis is present.

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • Vermont Service Center denied petition.

  • Counsel requested withdrawal on September 6, 2005.

  • AAO dismissed based on withdrawal by counsel.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: {'fit': 'narrow procedural example only', 'reason': 'Withdrawal disposition only; no criterion/final-merits analysis.'}

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Membership research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Withdrawal research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for NOV102005_07B2203