AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision NOV092015_01B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision NOV092015_01B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision NOV092015_01B2203: Appeal sustained. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal sustained The beneficiary was a de facto recipient of recognized advertising awards for a campaign’s integrated/interactive design; the campaign was a major field contribution; and the beneficiary performed a leading/critical role for a distinguished agency. AAO found sustained acclaim and top-of-field standing in final merits.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: Verified source is an AAO EB-1A extraordinary-ability proceeding.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

NOV092015_01B2203

Decision date as printed

November 9, 2015

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition appeal

Procedural posture

EB-1A appeal sustained; three criteria met and formal final-merits determination found eligibility.

Operative disposition

Appeal sustained

Final-merits status

AAO found the beneficiary among the small percentage at the top of experience design, with sustained national or international acclaim and field-recognized achievements.

What the AAO decision addressed

The beneficiary was a de facto recipient of recognized advertising awards for a campaign’s integrated/interactive design; the campaign was a major field contribution; and the beneficiary performed a leading/critical role for a distinguished agency. AAO found sustained acclaim and top-of-field standing in final merits.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

met — p. 3, p. 4

Membership

Not coded — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not coded — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not coded — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

met — p. 4, p. 5

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

met — p. 5

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The petitioner was an advertising agency seeking classification for its Creative Director in experience design.; pages: 1; 2

  • claim: The beneficiary was credited with a major and significant role in an award-winning campaign; AAO found him a de facto honoree of recognized advertising prizes.; pages: 3; 4

  • claim: Industry publications described the campaign as influential; AAO found the integrated/interactive campaign work an original contribution of major significance.; pages: 4; 5

  • claim: The beneficiary led product innovations and creative development at an agency with a distinguished reputation; leading/critical role criterion met.; pages: 5

  • claim: The AAO evaluated the total record, including campaign awards, influence, leadership, and expert recognition, and found sustained acclaim and top-of-field status.; pages: 5; 6; 7

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Performance sector research

  • Final Merits research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for NOV092015_01B2203