AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision NOV072016_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed AAO found lesser awards and national-team membership met. It found no one-time major award; published material failed complete-translation/aboutness/media evidence; athletic competitions were not artistic exhibitions; national-team participation alone did not establish a leading/critical role. Only two criteria were met.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: The source is an AAO EB-1A appeal/remand decision with case-specific procedural and evidentiary analysis.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | NOV072016_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | November 7, 2016 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition appeal |
Procedural posture | EB-1A appeal; dismissed after only two criteria were established; formal final merits not reached, with aggregate observations. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | Only two initial criteria were met; AAO expressly said the formal final-merits stage was unnecessary, though it made brief aggregate acclaim observations. |
What the AAO decision addressed
AAO found lesser awards and national-team membership met. It found no one-time major award; published material failed complete-translation/aboutness/media evidence; athletic competitions were not artistic exhibitions; national-team participation alone did not establish a leading/critical role. Only two criteria were met.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | met — p. 4 |
Membership | |
Published material about the person | |
Judging the work of others | Not coded — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not coded — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not coded — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | |
Leading or critical role | |
High salary or remuneration | Not coded — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Petitioner was a competitive ice skater; Director found one criterion and AAO issued an RFE, after which the petitioner submitted information about competition scoring.; pages: 1; 3
claim: The AAO accepted lesser awards for competition placements and membership on two national teams.; pages: 3; 4
claim: The international competitions were not shown to have awards qualifying as a one-time major internationally recognized achievement.; pages: 3
claim: Published articles had incomplete excerpt translations and no circulation data; the petitioner did not continue to press the published-material claim after the RFE.; pages: 4; 5
claim: The scoring system’s artistic elements did not transform athletic competitions into artistic exhibitions or showcases; no other display was documented.; pages: 5; 6
claim: The petitioner did not show his hierarchy or impact on the national team; generalized coach letters did not establish a leading/critical role.; pages: 6; 7
claim: AAO concluded only two criteria were satisfied and dismissed without formal final merits, while noting the record showed a talented skater but not the required acclaim.; pages: 7; 8
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
Athletics sector research
Final Merits research
Translat research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.