AAO research
EB-1A appeal arguments — AAO decision NOV062015_01B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed under 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v). Review source status, procedural…
Decision summary: AAO decision NOV062015_01B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed under 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v). The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | NOV062015_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2015-11-06 |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: Cyclist appeal; no reasons were stated in Form I-290B and no promised brief/additional evidence was filed after more than four months. AAO held the petitioner identified no erroneous conclusion of law or fact and that bare Form I-290B filing does not trigger criterion analysis/review.; citation_pages: 1; classification: Summary dismissal; no specific error identified; director_findings: The Director found the petitioner did not establish extraordinary ability or that he would continue to be employed in his field in the United States. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Appeal summarily dismissed under 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v).', 'basis': 'The one-page decision identifies cyclist field, director’s conclusion, absent brief and specific error, and summary dismissal.', 'citation_pages': [1]} |
Final-merits status | Not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {‘fit’: ‘Summary dismissal; no specific error identified’, ‘aggregation_valid’: True, ‘use’: ‘Potentially grouped only with cases sharing the same specific procedural disposition, keeping distinct field, timeline, and basis visible.’, ‘do_not_claim’: [‘Do not characterize this as an AAO merits adjudication of EB-1A criteria or final merits.’, ‘Do not infer individual criterion findings from a generalized director denial.’, ‘Do not treat a nonprecedent decision as binding authority.’], ‘caveat’: ‘Summary dismissal/motion disposition establishes only the procedural outcome in this record.’}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Final Merits research
Summary Dismissal research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.