AAO research
EB-1A membership — AAO decision NOV032011_01B2203: Appeal dismissed; petition denied. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed; petition denied The operative order and the AAO’s stated eligibility analysis; see the cited final pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: AAO decision on an EB-1A Form I-140 petition.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | NOV032011_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | November 3, 2011 |
Classification / field stated in source | AAO decision concerning a Form I-140 petition for EB-1A classification under INA § 203(b)(1)(A). |
Procedural posture | AAO appeal from denial of an EB-1A petition for an entrepreneur involved in hotel/motel properties and franchise projects; appeal dismissed. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed; petition denied |
Final-merits status | The AAO conducts a final-merits review and concludes local business success and community support do not establish sustained national/international acclaim or top-of-field status. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The operative order and the AAO’s stated eligibility analysis; see the cited final pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not considered — source PDF |
Membership | Not met — p. 5 |
Published material about the person | Not met — p. 6 |
Judging the work of others | Not considered — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not met — p. 6, p. 7, p. 8, p. 9, p. 10, p. 11, p. 12, p. 13, p. 14 |
Scholarly authorship | Not considered — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | |
High salary or remuneration | Not met — p. 9 |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The AAO describes an entrepreneur who invested in and renovated hotel/motel properties and developed local projects/franchises.; evidence_pages: 2; 5; 11; 12
claim: It found the association-membership, original-contribution, leading-role and high-salary criteria unmet, emphasizing lack of independent evidence of field-wide impact and distinguished organizational reputation.; evidence_pages: 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10; 11; 12; 13; 14
claim: The AAO then considered the totality, found acclaim not established, and dismissed the appeal.; evidence_pages: 15; 16; 17
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Entrepreneurship sector research
Final Merits research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.