AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision NOV032005_09B2203: Motions to reconsider

AAO EB-1A decision NOV032005_09B2203: Motions to reconsider

EB-1A motions to reconsider — AAO decision NOV032005_09B2203: The appeal is dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision NOV032005_09B2203: The appeal is dismissed. Appeal summarily dismissed under 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v) for failure to identify a specific erroneous conclusion or submit evidence addressing the denial.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_eb1a_procedural_record; this decision does not adjudicate EB-1A criteria on the merits.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

NOV032005_09B2203

Decision date as printed

November 3, 2005

Classification / field stated in source

Form I-140 extraordinary-ability classification under INA § 203(b)(1)(A) / EB-1A, as stated in the source.

Procedural posture

Vermont Service Center EB-1A appeal; self-represented. The Director found sustained national/international acclaim was not established. Petitioner asserted recognized reputation and requested reconsideration, but supplied no separate brief/evidence or specific challenge.

Operative disposition

The appeal is dismissed.

Final-merits status

not reached

What the AAO decision addressed

Appeal summarily dismissed under 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v) for failure to identify a specific erroneous conclusion or submit evidence addressing the denial.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not reached

Membership

not reached

Published material about the person

not reached

Judging the work of others

not reached

Original contributions of major significance

not reached

Scholarly authorship

not reached

Artistic display or showcases

not reached

Leading or critical role

not reached

High salary or remuneration

not reached

Commercial success in the performing arts

not reached

Source holds and limits

["The Director’s background conclusions and petitioner/counsel assertions are not AAO criterion holdings.", "Every criterion and final merits are not reached in this procedural disposition."]

Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer

  • The Director’s background conclusions and petitioner/counsel assertions are not AAO criterion holdings.

  • Every criterion and final merits are not reached in this procedural disposition.

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • p. 1, decision date, office/file heading and classification/posture as printed.

  • p. 2, procedural discussion, governing rule, and operative ORDER.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Do not aggregate identity-held documents. Other verified records may be grouped in a procedural index only by exact mechanism (summary dismissal, late appeal rejection, standing rejection), with dates, posture, and citations; preserve separate fact patterns.

Editorial use note: Eligible for procedural-only coverage after ordinary editorial review; keep primary PDF linked.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Final Merits research

  • Summary Dismissal research

  • Coverage research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for NOV032005_09B2203