AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision NOV022005_02B2203: Appeal arguments

AAO EB-1A decision NOV022005_02B2203: Appeal arguments

EB-1A appeal arguments — AAO decision NOV022005_02B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision NOV022005_02B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed. AAO found the petitioner did not specifically address the denial reasons or provide additional evidence, and did not identify an erroneous legal or factual conclusion.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_AAO_decision_no_precedent_status_asserted. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

NOV022005_02B2203

Decision date as printed

November 2, 2005

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A Form I-140; field not specified in the AAO discussion

Procedural posture

Vermont Service Center denial appealed by the self-represented petitioner. The petitioner expressed confidence in her work and requested reconsideration, but supplied no arguments/evidence addressing the regulatory criteria and said she would not file a separate brief/evidence.

Operative disposition

Appeal summarily dismissed.

Final-merits status

Not reached

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO found the petitioner did not specifically address the denial reasons or provide additional evidence, and did not identify an erroneous legal or factual conclusion.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached
The AAO disposition was procedural and did not decide this criterion. — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached
The AAO disposition was procedural and did not decide this criterion. — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached
The AAO disposition was procedural and did not decide this criterion. — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached
The AAO disposition was procedural and did not decide this criterion. — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not reached
The AAO disposition was procedural and did not decide this criterion. — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached
The AAO disposition was procedural and did not decide this criterion. — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not reached
The AAO disposition was procedural and did not decide this criterion. — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached
The AAO disposition was procedural and did not decide this criterion. — source PDF

Source holds and limits

["Do not infer a criterion-specific failure; Director findings are not reproduced."]

Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer

  • Do not infer a criterion-specific failure; Director findings are not reproduced.

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The source identifies an AAO decision dated November 2, 2005.; pages: 1

  • claim: The petition or motion classification is described as: EB-1A Form I-140; field not specified in the AAO discussion.; pages: 2

  • claim: Vermont Service Center denial appealed by the self-represented petitioner. The petitioner expressed confidence in her work and requested reconsideration, but supplied no arguments/evidence addressing the regulatory criteria and said she would not file a separate brief/evidence.; pages: 2

  • claim: AAO found the petitioner did not specifically address the denial reasons or provide additional evidence, and did not identify an erroneous legal or factual conclusion.; pages: 2

  • claim: Operative order: Appeal summarily dismissed.; pages: 2

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: narrow_procedural_explainer_only

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Membership research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Summary Dismissal research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for NOV022005_02B2203