AAO research
EB-1A withdrawal and mootness — AAO decision MAY272020_13B2203: Director decision withdrawn; remanded for new decision. Review source status, procedural…
Decision summary: The AAO director decision withdrawn; Remanded for new decision. Director omitted the awards criterion despite it being claimed; AAO finds submitted translator certifications facially meet requirements and no indication translations omitted full source text; Director must review published material and judging with translations and appeal evidence, reconsider thirteen albums/live and televised performances/social-media material for original contributions, and reassess intent to continue work. Final merits only if three criteria are met.
Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.
Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAY272020_13B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | May 27, 2020 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability; field: singer and songwriter. |
Procedural posture | Appeal; AAO withdraws denial and remands because Director did not address all claims/evidence and misstated translation requirements. |
Operative disposition | Director decision withdrawn; Remanded for new decision. |
Final-merits status | Not reached; conditional final-merits review required only if at least three criteria are found on remand. |
What the AAO decision addressed
Director omitted the awards criterion despite it being claimed; AAO finds submitted translator certifications facially meet requirements and no indication translations omitted full source text; Director must review published material and judging with translations and appeal evidence, reconsider thirteen albums/live and televised performances/social-media material for original contributions, and reassess intent to continue work. Final merits only if three criteria are met.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | not considered |
Membership | Not coded — source PDF |
Published material about the person | not considered |
Judging the work of others | not considered |
Original contributions of major significance | not considered |
Scholarly authorship | Not coded — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not coded — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not coded — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
Source holds and limits
"AAO does not decide the criteria; no outcome on merits. The current holding concerns inadequate adjudication."
Source-cited findings recorded in review
PDF p. 1: Cover identifies singer/songwriter, Nebraska Service Center appeal, May 27, 2020; Director found threshold unmet and continue-work intent unsupported; AAO remands.
PDF p. 2: Four claimed criteria listed; Director omitted the awards evidence and did not evaluate it; remand instruction.
PDF p. 3: Translation certifications found compliant on face; Director instructed to assess translated publication/judging evidence and appeal evidence; original-contribution evidence (13 albums, live/televised performances, social status) must be reconsidered; conditional final-merits and continue-work review; order remands.
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Useful procedural comparator for omitted claims, translation certification, meaningful review, music contributions evidence, and conditional final merits.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Performance sector research
Final Merits research
Remand research
Translat research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.