AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision MAY272008_02B2203: Apparent dismissal order missing. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision MAY272008_02B2203: Apparent dismissal order missing. Source is held: physical PDF has 10 pages, but pages 7–10 are blank; readable content stops on page 6 during the published-material criterion, before the decision’s remaining analysis, conclusion, or order. Do not rely on the apparent opening disposition as the complete operative outcome. The available text shows awards, membership, and published-material concerns; remaining criterion and final-merits states cannot be reliably completed.
Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.
Scope classification from review: The available source identifies an EB-1A petition/appeal or motion; the held item is in scope but cannot support a complete case summary.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAY272008_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | Header date not legible in supplied PDF; petition filed Aug. 16, 2005 |
Classification / field stated in source | Legacy EB-1A appeal; source PDF is incomplete |
Procedural posture | Opening discussion says appeal will be dismissed, but the supplied PDF ends mid-analysis before the conclusion and operative order. |
Operative disposition | apparent_dismissal_order_missing |
Final-merits status | The decision’s final analysis and order are absent from the provided PDF; do not infer a final-merits result or operative disposition from the opening discussion alone. |
What the AAO decision addressed
Source is held: physical PDF has 10 pages, but pages 7–10 are blank; readable content stops on page 6 during the published-material criterion, before the decision’s remaining analysis, conclusion, or order. Do not rely on the apparent opening disposition as the complete operative outcome. The available text shows awards, membership, and published-material concerns; remaining criterion and final-merits states cannot be reliably completed.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | |
Membership | Not met — p. 5 |
Published material about the person | Not met — p. 6 |
Judging the work of others | Not coded — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not coded — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not coded — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not coded — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not coded — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
Source holds and limits
"Incomplete source: the text ends mid-analysis on physical page 6; physical pages 7–10 are blank, and the decision conclusion and operative order are missing."
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The petitioner sought EB-1A classification in athletics and proposed U.S. work as a bodybuilding coach/trainer; he had competed in bodybuilding and previously coached in India.; pages: 2; 3; 4
claim: AAO stated that awards from the petitioner’s 1970s–1980s bodybuilding competition career could not establish awards in the coach/trainer area of intended U.S. work; coaching evidence ended in the 1990s.; pages: 4; 5
claim: Membership evidence did not establish qualifying outstanding-achievement admission requirements; published articles lacked required source/date/author or major-media proof.; pages: 5; 6
claim: The available source ends during published-material analysis on PDF page 6; pages 7–10 are blank and no conclusion/order is present.; pages: 6
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: held_incomplete_source
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
PDF page 1 — Caption/date/classification/field and posture visually checked.
PDF page 10 — Blank trailing PDF page visually confirmed; no decision text.
PDF page 7 — Blank trailing PDF page visually confirmed; no decision text.
PDF page 8 — Blank trailing PDF page visually confirmed; no decision text.
PDF page 9 — Blank trailing PDF page visually confirmed; no decision text.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Athletics sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.