AAO research
EB-1A appeal disposition — AAO decision MAY242007_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision MAY242007_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_eb1a_decision_or_related_proceeding. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAY242007_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | Not stated in normalized review fields |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: Appeal of Vermont Service Center denial of Form I-140 EB-1A petition.; citation_pages: 3; 4; 5; classification: Appeal of Vermont Service Center denial of Form I-140 EB-1A petition. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Appeal dismissed.', 'basis': 'The petitioner claimed awards, association membership, published material, original contributions and scholarly authorship. The AAO found the submitted awards were not major internationally recognized awards, membership requirements did not demand outstanding achievements, media coverage and articles failed the publication criterion, and the letters did not establish major contributions. The petition did not establish the required initial evidence and the aggregate record did not show extraordinary ability.', 'citation_pages': [3, 4, 5, 6]} |
Final-merits status | The AAO also reviewed the record and found no sustained acclaim/top-of-field standing; it did not find eligibility. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not met — source PDF |
Membership | Not met — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not met — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not considered — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not met — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not met — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not considered — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not considered — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {'eligible_for_narrow_comparison': True, 'fit': 'Narrow comparison on local awards, association admission standards, major-media coverage and objective proof of contribution.', 'caveats': 'Older, redacted nonprecedent decision using an earlier framework; confirm current law before relying on any doctrinal phrasing.'}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Coverage research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.