AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision MAY202011_02B2203: Appeal sustained; petition approved. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal sustained; petition approved The AAO found qualifying original contributions, scholarly authorship, and a critical role; the final-merits review found the record established sustained acclaim and top-of-field standing.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: Source is an AAO Form I-140 EB-1A extraordinary-ability decision and the reviewed appeal concerns the claimed classification.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAY202011_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | May 20, 2011 |
Classification / field stated in source | Form I-140 EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition under INA §203(b)(1)(A). |
Procedural posture | Appeal of Texas Service Center denial; AAO review; appeal sustained and petition approved. |
Operative disposition | Appeal sustained; petition approved |
Final-merits status | The AAO conducted final-merits review and found the petitioner established sustained acclaim and top-of-field standing, including evidence of citation growth and database use outside the petitioner’s immediate collaborators. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The AAO found qualifying original contributions, scholarly authorship, and a critical role; the final-merits review found the record established sustained acclaim and top-of-field standing.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not met — p. 5 |
Membership | Not met — p. 5 |
Published material about the person | Not met — p. 5 |
Judging the work of others | |
Original contributions of major significance | |
Scholarly authorship | met — p. 9 |
Artistic display or showcases | Not met — p. 6 |
Leading or critical role | met — p. 9 |
High salary or remuneration | Not considered — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The petitioner sought classification as a researcher in molecular genetics; the record concerned work on WFS1 and a database cataloging genetic variants.; pages: 2; 6; 7; 8
claim: The AAO rejected the awards, membership, published-material, judging, and display claims; the database-editor role did not establish judging of other researchers.; pages: 5; 6
claim: The AAO found original contributions of major significance based on research and a useful database with corroborating expert evidence; it also found scholarly authorship and a critical role for an institution with distinguished reputation.; pages: 6; 7; 8; 9
claim: The AAO found the totality, including citation growth and outside clinical use of the database, established sustained acclaim and top-of-field standing; the appeal was sustained and petition approved.; pages: 9; 10
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Medicine sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.