AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision MAY192014_01B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision MAY192014_01B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision MAY192014_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision MAY192014_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Two criteria were credited: judging and commercial success in performing arts. Awards, membership, published material and high salary were not established; fewer than three criteria, so no final-merits review. (pp. 8–10).

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

MAY192014_01B2203

Decision date as printed

May 19, 2014

Classification / field stated in source

Arts; folk singer / performing artist

Procedural posture

Appeal of denial of an EB-1A petition; AAO appellate review.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Final-merits status

No formal final-merits determination; only two criteria were established. (pp. 9–10)

What the AAO decision addressed

Two criteria were credited: judging and commercial success in performing arts. Awards, membership, published material and high salary were not established; fewer than three criteria, so no final-merits review. (pp. 8–10)

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not met
The evidence did not establish a qualifying recognized award. (pp. 8–9) — source PDF

Membership

not met
The evidence did not show the qualifying selective membership standard. (p. 9) — source PDF

Published material about the person

not met
The record did not establish qualifying material about the petitioner in qualifying outlets. (p. 9) — source PDF

Judging the work of others

met
AAO credited evidence of the petitioner serving as a judge. (p. 9) — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not coded — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not coded — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not met — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

met — source PDF

Source holds and limits

The appeal remained denied despite two credited criteria; keep this outcome explicit. (pp. 9–10)

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: A cited folk-music example can distinguish documented performing-arts commercial success from general recognition.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Performance sector research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for MAY192014_01B2203