AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision MAY182007_01B2203: Leading or critical role

AAO EB-1A decision MAY182007_01B2203: Leading or critical role

EB-1A leading or critical role — AAO decision MAY182007_01B2203: Director decision withdrawn; appeal sustained; petition approved. Review source status…

Decision summary: AAO decision MAY182007_01B2203: Director decision withdrawn; appeal sustained; petition approved. AAO found international award evidence met the awards criterion; multiple festival screenings met display; producing/screenwriting/directing acclaimed festival films met leading/critical role. Record also supported sustained national acclaim and continued work in field.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: EB-1A merits appeal and approval; historical pre-Kazarian decision.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

MAY182007_01B2203

Decision date as printed

May 18, 2007

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A appeal sustained; petition approved

Procedural posture

Director denied for lack of acclaim. AAO found awards, display, and leading/critical role met, including international film awards, screenings at major festivals, and directing a commissioned film that won awards. Additional evidence included film reviews and professional roles.

Operative disposition

Director decision withdrawn; appeal sustained; petition approved.

Final-merits status

Reached; AAO found sustained acclaim and approved petition.

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO found international award evidence met the awards criterion; multiple festival screenings met display; producing/screenwriting/directing acclaimed festival films met leading/critical role. Record also supported sustained national acclaim and continued work in field.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

met — source PDF

Membership

Not reached — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

met
AAO found production, screenwriting and directing roles in acclaimed films sufficient. — p. 3

High salary or remuneration

Not reached — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Decision dated May 18, 2007 concerns screenwriter/film director; director denied for lack of sustained acclaim.; pages: 1; 2

  • claim: AAO found awards criterion met based on awards including Asian Film Award at Tokyo International Film Festival, Best Screenplay at Torino, and Santa Fe festival award.; pages: 3

  • claim: AAO found display criterion met based on screenings at major international festivals and Palm Springs International Film Festival.; pages: 3

  • claim: AAO found leading/critical-role criterion met based on producing, authoring screenplay, and directing acclaimed films, including commissioned film that won awards.; pages: 3

  • claim: Reviews, professional positions, and other record evidence supported acclaim; appeal sustained and petition approved.; pages: 4

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible historical approval; use with a clear date/framework qualifier.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Published material about the person research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Performance sector research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for MAY182007_01B2203