AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision MAY172012_01B2203: Appeal timeliness

AAO EB-1A decision MAY172012_01B2203: Appeal timeliness

EB-1A appeal timeliness — AAO decision MAY172012_01B2203: Appeal rejected as untimely filed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official…

Decision summary: AAO decision MAY172012_01B2203: Appeal rejected as untimely filed. Director issued denial December 6, 2010; notice gave 33 days. Appeal received January 13, 2011, 38 days later. Counsel said neither applicant nor counsel received denial until January 6, but USCIS issued it to petitioner too and record showed no return of petitioner’s copy; Director found late appeal did not satisfy motion requirements.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_AAO_decision_no_precedent_status_asserted. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

MAY172012_01B2203

Decision date as printed

May 17, 2012

Classification / field stated in source

Not specified

Procedural posture

Texas Service Center EB-1A denial; counsel appealed; notice to counsel was returned undeliverable, then reissued, but petitioner’s copy was not returned.

Operative disposition

Appeal rejected as untimely filed.

Final-merits status

Not reached

What the AAO decision addressed

Director issued denial December 6, 2010; notice gave 33 days. Appeal received January 13, 2011, 38 days later. Counsel said neither applicant nor counsel received denial until January 6, but USCIS issued it to petitioner too and record showed no return of petitioner’s copy; Director found late appeal did not satisfy motion requirements.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Source holds and limits

status:

Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer

  • Do not generalize from this record to current service rules without independent verification.

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Cover date May 17, 2012; Texas Service Center; EB-1A Form I-140.; pages: 1

  • claim: Director issued decision December 6, 2010 and provided 33-day appeal deadline; counsel’s copy returned undeliverable and reissued, while petitioner’s copy was not shown returned.; pages: 2

  • claim: Appeal was received January 13, 2011, 38 days after issuance; counsel asserted receipt January 6, but decision states USCIS had also issued notice to petitioner.; pages: 2

  • claim: Director declined motion treatment; AAO rejected appeal as untimely.; pages: 2

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: narrow_procedural_explainer_only

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Membership research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Untimely research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for MAY172012_01B2203