AAO research
EB-1A published material about the person — AAO decision MAY162022_02B2203: Director decision withdrawn; remanded for further review and a new decision.…
Decision summary: The AAO director decision withdrawn; Remanded for further review and a new decision. Director’s final-merits analysis was incomplete and did not weigh evidence relating to initial criteria, contradictions, and potentially relevant record evidence; meaningful appellate review was not possible.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: EB-1A merits appeal; final merits remains unresolved.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAY162022_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | May 16, 2022 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A appeal; final-merits denial withdrawn and Remanded |
Procedural posture | Earlier appeal found three criteria and Remanded for final merits. Director again denied, citing contradictory statements and failing to properly analyze all submitted evidence; AAO found incomplete analysis, including evidence regarding a 2007 children’s story-writing competition and other relevant evidence. |
Operative disposition | Director decision withdrawn; Remanded for further review and a new decision. |
Final-merits status | Not reached; director’s final-merits decision withdrawn and Remanded. |
What the AAO decision addressed
Director’s final-merits analysis was incomplete and did not weigh evidence relating to initial criteria, contradictions, and potentially relevant record evidence; meaningful appellate review was not possible.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | met — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | met |
Judging the work of others | met — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Decision dated May 16, 2022 identifies petitioner as children’s book author; prior appeal found three criteria and Remanded for final merits.; pages: 1
claim: On new appeal AAO withdrew director denial and reviewed de novo; prior decision had established three criteria under sections 204.5(h)(3)(i), (iii), and (iv) as visible in source page 2.; pages: 1; 2
claim: Director’s final-merits analysis contained contradictory statements and failed to consider evidence in totality, including 2007 children’s story-writing competition evidence.; pages: 2; 3
claim: AAO held decision did not sufficiently address whether petitioner showed sustained acclaim/top-of-field status; Remanded for complete review and new decision.; pages: 3
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible for final-merits analysis/completeness topic; not an approval.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Published material about the person research
Leading or critical role research
Performance sector research
Final Merits research
Remand research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.