AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision MAY152012_03B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed Evidence of the petitioner’s own athletic awards and recognition did not establish acclaim as a coach; the decision found insufficient qualifying evidence in the claimed coaching field and dismissed.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: The decision is an extraordinary-ability Form I-140 appeal; the petitioner’s claimed continuing occupation is coaching. (pp. 1–2, 7–8). This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAY152012_03B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | May 15, 2012 |
Classification / field stated in source | Form I-140 EB-1A extraordinary-ability appeal decision. |
Procedural posture | Appeal of service-center denial; appeal dismissed. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | The initial three-criterion threshold was not met. |
What the AAO decision addressed
Evidence of the petitioner’s own athletic awards and recognition did not establish acclaim as a coach; the decision found insufficient qualifying evidence in the claimed coaching field and dismissed.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | |
Membership | Not met — p. 7 |
Published material about the person | Not met — p. 7 |
Judging the work of others | Not coded — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not coded — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not coded — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not coded — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not coded — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The AAO evaluated the claimed field as swimming coach and distinguished the petitioner’s earlier accomplishments as an athlete from recognition as a coach.; pages: 6; 7
claim: The decision found evidence of awards as an athlete did not establish the awards criterion in the coaching field, and comparable evidence was not established as appropriate.; pages: 6; 7
claim: Membership and published-material claims were not established in the claimed coaching field; no published material about the petitioner relating to coaching predated filing.; pages: 7
claim: The appeal was dismissed; formal final merits was not reached after the initial threshold failed.; pages: 8
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Athletics sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.