AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision MAY142019_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The petitioner did not establish the one-time award or any three initial criteria. Certificates did not show major/national award recognition; evidence failed on awards, published material, judging, contributions, scholarly manuals, and national-team role.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: The PDF identifies this as an AAO Form I-140 EB-1A extraordinary-ability decision under INA §203(b)(1)(A).. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAY142019_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | May 14, 2019 |
Classification / field stated in source | Form I-140 EB-1A extraordinary-ability decision under INA §203(b)(1)(A). |
Procedural posture | Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial of Form I-140; appeal dismissed. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | The AAO expressly says a Kazarian final-merits determination is unnecessary because the threshold was not met; it separately notes aggregate review does not support eligibility. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The petitioner did not establish the one-time award or any three initial criteria. Certificates did not show major/national award recognition; evidence failed on awards, published material, judging, contributions, scholarly manuals, and national-team role.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | |
Membership | Not considered — source PDF |
Published material about the person | |
Judging the work of others | Not met — p. 6 |
Original contributions of major significance | |
Scholarly authorship | Not met — p. 7 |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | |
High salary or remuneration | Not considered — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The petitioner is a karate competitor who planned to continue competing nationally and internationally; appeal dismissed on de novo review.; pages: 1; 2
claim: The AAO found no one-time major internationally recognized award; certificates and photographs did not establish broader recognition, including for Armenian/international tournament awards.; pages: 2; 3; 4
claim: Published-material evidence did not establish major media and had source/translation deficiencies.; pages: 4; 5
claim: Referee letters and training did not show that he judged competitors’ work rather than officiated rules; coaching, student medals, and manuals did not show original field-wide contributions.; pages: 6; 7
claim: Membership on the Armenian national team did not establish a leading/critical role or distinguished reputation of the team.; pages: 7; 8
claim: The AAO stated that final merits was not reached and dismissed the appeal.; pages: 8
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
PDF page 1 — Opening page visually inspected; date, identity, classification and posture checked.
PDF page 8 — Final physical page visually inspected; conclusion and operative order checked.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Athletics sector research
Performance sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.