AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision MAY142013_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The AAO found fewer than three qualifying evidentiary categories and dismissed the appeal; final merits was not reached.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: Source is an AAO EB-1A decision. It is nonprecedent; case-specific procedure and merits-stage distinctions are retained.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAY142013_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | May 14, 2013 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability Form I-140 |
Procedural posture | AAO appeal from Texas Service Center denial; appeal dismissed. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | The AAO states the antecedent requirement of at least three evidentiary categories was not met; it does not conduct final-merits review. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The AAO found fewer than three qualifying evidentiary categories and dismissed the appeal; final merits was not reached.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not met — p. 4 |
Membership | Not considered — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not considered — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | met — p. 5 |
Original contributions of major significance | Not met — p. 6, p. 7, p. 8, p. 9, p. 10, p. 11, p. 12, p. 13, p. 14, p. 15, p. 16, p. 17 |
Scholarly authorship | met — p. 18 |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | |
High salary or remuneration | |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The petition sought EB-1A classification in the sciences based on the petitioner’s agricultural science research.; evidence_pages: 2; 4
claim: The AAO evaluated claimed awards, judging, original contributions, scholarly authorship, leading or critical role, and high salary evidence.; evidence_pages: 4; 5; 6; 18; 19; 20; 21
claim: The AAO found judging and scholarly authorship met, but concluded the petitioner had not established three qualifying categories.; evidence_pages: 5; 18; 21
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Medicine sector research
Threshold research
Final Merits research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.