AAO research
EB-1A membership — AAO decision MAY102024_03B2203: Current submission dismissed as moot. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision MAY102024_03B2203: Current submission dismissed as moot. The separate first appeal was pending for its own decision; current repeated submission lacked practical significance.
Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAY102024_03B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2024-05-10 |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | Second appeal/submission concerning same petition; separate first-appeal decision forthcoming; current submission dismissed as moot |
Operative disposition | Current submission dismissed as moot. |
Final-merits status | Not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
The separate first appeal was pending for its own decision; current repeated submission lacked practical significance.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Membership | unclear |
Published material about the person | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | unclear |
Original contributions of major significance | unclear |
Scholarly authorship | unclear |
Artistic display or showcases | unclear |
Leading or critical role | unclear |
High salary or remuneration | unclear |
Commercial success in the performing arts | unclear |
Source holds and limits
["Not a criterion-level merits disposition.", "The first appeal has a separate decision not included in this source; this page does not resolve those issues.", "Do not assign “met” to any particular criterion based on the count of two."]
Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer
Not a criterion-level merits disposition.
The first appeal has a separate decision not included in this source; this page does not resolve those issues.
Do not assign “met” to any particular criterion based on the count of two.
Source-cited findings recorded in review
Petitioner is a data center/network engineer in the pharmaceutical industry.
Director found two of ten initial evidentiary criteria met, one fewer than required for final-merits determination; the decision does not identify which two.
Petitioner had previously appealed; AAO states it will issue a separate decision on the first appeal.
Current submission raised the same issues as the first appeal and was dismissed as moot.
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {'fit': 'limited procedural example', 'reason': 'May illustrate duplicate/repeated appeal submission dismissed as moot, with a separately pending appeal; criterion-specific evidence should not be inferred.'}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Membership research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.