AAO research
EB-1A original contributions of major significance — AAO decision MAY102006_03B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the…
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The petitioner’s specialized expertise, business activity, letters, and compensation evidence did not establish three regulatory criteria or sustained acclaim; appeal dismissed.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: Complete identity-matched AAO decision concerning EB-1A eligibility or motion review of such eligibility.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAY102006_03B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2006-05-10 |
Classification / field stated in source | alligator-leather tanning and finishing specialist / business manager; EB-1A petition |
Procedural posture | Appeal from denial of EB-1A petition. AAO reviews claimed original contributions, leading/critical role, and high salary, and dismisses for failure to establish at least three criteria. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | The petitioner’s specialized expertise, business activity, letters, and compensation evidence did not establish three regulatory criteria or sustained acclaim; appeal dismissed. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The petitioner’s specialized expertise, business activity, letters, and compensation evidence did not establish three regulatory criteria or sustained acclaim; appeal dismissed.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not considered — source PDF |
Membership | Not considered — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not considered — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not considered — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | |
Scholarly authorship | Not considered — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not met — p. 6 |
High salary or remuneration | Not met — p. 6 |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The petitioner worked in specialized alligator-leather tanning and finishing and managed a leather business.; pages: 2; 3; 5
claim: AAO found the evidence did not show major-significance contributions, a qualifying leading role, or qualifying high salary.; pages: 5; 6; 7
claim: The appeal was dismissed for failure to establish the required eligibility.; pages: 7; 8
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Entrepreneurship sector research
Threshold research
Final Merits research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.