AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision MAY082019_02B2203: Leading or critical role

AAO EB-1A decision MAY082019_02B2203: Leading or critical role

EB-1A leading or critical role — AAO decision MAY082019_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision MAY082019_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. AAO accepted published material about soccer career and leading/critical coaching role, but rejected claimed qualifying membership and original contributions; awards were not pursued on appeal. He did not establish three criteria, and the decision did not conduct the formal Kazarian final-merits step. (pp. 1–8).

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

MAY082019_02B2203

Decision date as printed

May 8, 2019

Classification / field stated in source

Athletics; soccer coach and former professional player in German leagues

Procedural posture

Appeal from Nebraska Service Center denial; dismissed because fewer than three criteria were met.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Final-merits status

Not reached as a separate formal final-merits determination because only two criteria were met; AAO notes aggregate record was insufficient. (pp. 7–8)

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO accepted published material about soccer career and leading/critical coaching role, but rejected claimed qualifying membership and original contributions; awards were not pursued on appeal. He did not establish three criteria, and the decision did not conduct the formal Kazarian final-merits step. (pp. 1–8)

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not met — source PDF

Membership

Not met — source PDF

Published material about the person

met — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not coded — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

met
Assistant-coaching role for a German team with documented strong league standing and improved placements was accepted. (p. 7) — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • (p. 3)

  • (pp. 3–5)

  • (p. 5)

  • (pp. 5–7)

  • (p. 7)

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Soccer comparator on professional-league participation vs association membership, licensing vs selective membership, and team-level coaching testimonials vs field-wide original impact. Individual case page; two criteria met; formal merits not reached.

Editorial use note: Individual case page; two criteria met; formal merits not reached.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Athletics sector research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for MAY082019_02B2203