AAO research
EB-1A motions to reconsider — AAO decision MAY082014_01B2203: Motion to reconsider dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official…
Decision summary: AAO decision MAY082014_01B2203: Motion to reconsider dismissed. AAO finds no error of law or policy in prior decision warranting reconsideration.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_EB1A_AAO_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAY082014_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | May 8, 2014 |
Classification / field stated in source | Motion to reconsider dismissed. |
Procedural posture | Motion to reconsider prior AAO denial; procedural review. |
Operative disposition | Motion to reconsider dismissed. |
Final-merits status | Underlying merits disposition remains; no fresh final-merits analysis. |
What the AAO decision addressed
AAO finds no error of law or policy in prior decision warranting reconsideration.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Cover: May 8, 2014; motion to reconsider; identities redacted.; pages: 1
claim: AAO recounts history and prior denial.; pages: 2
claim: AAO considers claim of error in prior analysis.; pages: 3
claim: AAO finds no qualifying error and dismisses motion; prior denial remains.; pages: 4
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: eligible_for_narrow_fact_grounded_content: True; must_preserve_procedural_posture: True; recommended_use: Procedural reconsideration example; do not infer criterion outcome from prior issues restated in motion.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Published material about the person research
Leading or critical role research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.