AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision MAY052015_01B2203: Published material about the person

AAO EB-1A decision MAY052015_01B2203: Published material about the person

EB-1A published material about the person — AAO decision MAY052015_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official…

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed Original contributions and leading/critical role are established; published material is not established and high-salary issue is abandoned. The three-criterion threshold is not met; no formal final-merits determination.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: The source identifies an EB-1A / extraordinary-ability Form I-140 matter under INA section 203(b)(1)(A), including the motion proceeding in OCT052020_07B2203.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

MAY052015_01B2203

Decision date as printed

2015-05-05

Classification / field stated in source

art conservator/restorer; EB-1A petition in the arts

Procedural posture

Appeal from denial. AAO finds original contributions and leading/critical role met; published material and high salary not met/abandoned; fewer than three criteria.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

Original contributions and leading/critical role are established; published material is not established and high-salary issue is abandoned. The three-criterion threshold is not met; no formal final-merits determination.

What the AAO decision addressed

Original contributions and leading/critical role are established; published material is not established and high-salary issue is abandoned. The three-criterion threshold is not met; no formal final-merits determination.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not considered — source PDF

Membership

Not considered — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not met — p. 3, p. 4, p. 5

Judging the work of others

Not considered — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

met — p. 6

Scholarly authorship

Not considered — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not considered — source PDF

Leading or critical role

met — p. 6, p. 7

High salary or remuneration

abandoned — p. 7

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Beneficiary is an art conservator/restorer; appeal contests failure to find at least three criteria.; pages: 1; 2

  • claim: Articles are not about the beneficiary’s qualifying work or lack qualifying publication/translation evidence; one article about her work appeared in a publication not shown to be major media.; pages: 3; 4; 5; 6

  • claim: AAO finds original contributions of major significance established and recognizes specific leadership and restoration responsibilities at a distinguished institution.; pages: 6; 7

  • claim: High-salary issue is abandoned; less than three criteria, so no formal final-merits determination; appeal dismissed.; pages: 7; 8

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Performance sector research

  • Threshold research

  • Final Merits research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for MAY052015_01B2203