AAO research
EB-1A three-criterion threshold — AAO decision MAY032018_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision MAY032018_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. AAO agrees judging and scholarly authorship are met, but finds research productivity, citations, and reliance on data do not establish original contributions of major significance. Fewer than three criteria are met.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_AAO_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAY032018_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | May 3, 2018 |
Classification / field stated in source | Appeal dismissed. |
Procedural posture | Appeal from denial; AAO reviews judging, original contributions, and scholarly authorship. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed. |
Final-merits status | Final merits not reached because threshold evidence is insufficient. |
What the AAO decision addressed
AAO agrees judging and scholarly authorship are met, but finds research productivity, citations, and reliance on data do not establish original contributions of major significance. Fewer than three criteria are met.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached |
Judging the work of others | met — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not met — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | met — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Cover: May 3, 2018; petitioner is astrophysics researcher; appeal from denial.; pages: 1
claim: AAO describes postdoctoral researcher and claimed judging, contributions, and authorship criteria.; pages: 2
claim: AAO evaluates original contribution claims including use of radio relic data and citations; finds evidence does not establish major significance.; pages: 3
claim: AAO finds scholarly authorship met through more than 20 peer-reviewed articles and summarizes conclusion that fewer than three criteria met.; pages: 4
claim: Order dismisses appeal; final merits not reached.; pages: 5
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: eligible_for_narrow_fact_grounded_content: True; must_preserve_procedural_posture: True; recommended_use: Useful researcher example separating peer review/authorship and productivity/citation evidence from major field impact. Avoid reducing significance to citation counts alone; explain full context.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Published material about the person research
Leading or critical role research
Medicine sector research
Major Significance research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.