AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision MAY012006_03B2203: Appeal timeliness

AAO EB-1A decision MAY012006_03B2203: Appeal timeliness

EB-1A appeal timeliness — AAO decision MAY012006_03B2203: The appeal is rejected as untimely filed; the source cover identifies EB-1A while the discussion…

Decision summary: AAO decision MAY012006_03B2203: The appeal is rejected as untimely filed; the source cover identifies EB-1A while the discussion calls the petition nonimmigrant. Page 2 says the appeal was rejected as untimely and that the Director declined to treat it as a motion; page 1/2 pairing has a source-identity/content conflict and must be held pending authoritative reconciliation.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: hold_source_identity_classification_conflict. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

MAY012006_03B2203

Decision date as printed

May 1, 2006

Classification / field stated in source

Conflicting source descriptions: EB-1A cover vs nonimmigrant-visa discussion.

Procedural posture

Cover identifies a Vermont Service Center Form I-140 EB-1A petition. The second page describes a “nonimmigrant visa petition” and analyzes an untimely appeal (decision July 3, 2005; appeal received August 18, 2005, 44 days later). These are materially different petition descriptions/postures.

Operative disposition

The appeal is rejected as untimely filed; the source cover identifies EB-1A while the discussion calls the petition nonimmigrant.

Final-merits status

not reached

What the AAO decision addressed

Page 2 says the appeal was rejected as untimely and that the Director declined to treat it as a motion; page 1/2 pairing has a source-identity/content conflict and must be held pending authoritative reconciliation.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not reached

Membership

not reached

Published material about the person

not reached

Judging the work of others

not reached

Original contributions of major significance

not reached

Scholarly authorship

not reached

Artistic display or showcases

not reached

Leading or critical role

not reached

High salary or remuneration

not reached

Commercial success in the performing arts

not reached

Source holds and limits

p. 1 identifies a Form I-140 EB-1A petition, while p. 2 repeatedly calls it a nonimmigrant visa petition and decides an untimely appeal; classification/posture conflict.

Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer

  • The Director’s background conclusions and petitioner/counsel assertions are not AAO criterion holdings.

  • Every criterion and final merits are not reached in this procedural disposition.

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • p. 1, decision date, office/file heading and classification/posture as printed.

  • p. 2, conflicting petition description and untimely appeal outcome.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Do not aggregate identity-held documents. Other verified records may be grouped in a procedural index only by exact mechanism (summary dismissal, late appeal rejection, standing rejection), with dates, posture, and citations; preserve separate fact patterns.

Editorial use note: Hold from EB-1A publication until authoritative identity/classification reconciliation.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Summary Dismissal research

  • Untimely research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for MAY012006_03B2203