AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision MAR312014_01B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision MAR312014_01B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision MAR312014_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The petitioner did not establish qualifying evidence under at least three regulatory criteria. The decision separately states that a detailed final-merits determination was unnecessary after the threshold failure.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: The source is an AAO decision on an EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

MAR312014_01B2203

Decision date as printed

March 31, 2014

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability (Form I-140)

Procedural posture

AAO de novo appeal of denial of EB-1A Form I-140; petitioner responded to a notice of intent to dismiss raising a material-misrepresentation concern, but AAO declined to enter a misrepresentation finding. Nonprecedent decision.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

The decision explains the next step would be final merits if three criteria were met, but states the threshold was not met and no detailed final-merits determination is needed.

What the AAO decision addressed

The petitioner did not establish qualifying evidence under at least three regulatory criteria. The decision separately states that a detailed final-merits determination was unnecessary after the threshold failure.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not met — p. 5, p. 6

Membership

Not met — p. 7

Published material about the person

Not met — p. 8

Judging the work of others

met — p. 7

Original contributions of major significance

abandoned — p. 6

Scholarly authorship

Not met — p. 8, p. 9

Artistic display or showcases

Not met — p. 9

Leading or critical role

Not considered — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not considered — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The petitioner claimed multiple regulatory criteria for work as an acrobatic performer; the AAO considered evidence relating to awards, membership, judging, published material, scholarly authorship and artistic display.; evidence_pages: 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9

  • claim: The AAO found awards and membership unmet; it found the judging criterion met, while published material, scholarly authorship and artistic display were not met. Some issues were abandoned on appeal.; evidence_pages: 5; 6; 7; 8; 9

  • claim: The decision states that fewer than three criteria were established, so a separate final-merits analysis was unnecessary; appeal dismissed.; evidence_pages: 2; 10

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Performance sector research

  • Threshold research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for MAR312014_01B2203