AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision MAR312010_02B2203: Appeal timeliness

AAO EB-1A decision MAR312010_02B2203: Appeal timeliness

EB-1A appeal timeliness — AAO decision MAR312010_02B2203: Appeal rejected as untimely. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision MAR312010_02B2203: Appeal rejected as untimely. No authority to extend deadline; supporting records were previously submitted or not new, and reconsideration lacked precedent showing error.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: EB-1A procedural appeal; no criteria adjudicated in this decision.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

MAR312010_02B2203

Decision date as printed

March 31, 2010

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A appeal rejected as untimely; later-submitted evidence did not qualify as reopening/reconsideration motion

Procedural posture

Appeal of July 13, 2009 denial was misfiled to AAO and received after 37 days; director had given correct filing instructions.

Operative disposition

Appeal rejected as untimely.

Final-merits status

Not coded in the normalized review fields

What the AAO decision addressed

No authority to extend deadline; supporting records were previously submitted or not new, and reconsideration lacked precedent showing error.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not reached — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Cover dated March 31, 2010 identifies EB-1A petition and self-represented petitioner.; pages: 1

  • claim: Director issued denial July 13, 2009; appeal was improperly sent to AAO on August 19 (37 days later), then forwarded and received by service center August 27 (45 days later).; pages: 2

  • claim: Evidence on late appeal was previously submitted or not new; reconsideration lacked precedent establishing legal/policy error; appeal rejected.; pages: 3

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Procedural-only; exclude from criterion outcome aggregation.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Published material about the person research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Untimely research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for MAR312010_02B2203