AAO research
EB-1A appeal timeliness — AAO decision MAR312008_01B2203: Appeal rejected as untimely filed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official…
Decision summary: AAO decision MAR312008_01B2203: Appeal rejected as untimely filed. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAR312008_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | Not stated in normalized review fields |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: The revocation decision was rendered December 27, 2007. The appeal was properly filed February 25, 2008, 90 days later. The revocation notice erroneously said the petitioner could appeal within 33 days; the regulation provided 15 days for a revocation appeal. The AAO found the late appeal did not meet motion-to-reopen or reconsider requirements and rejected it as untimely.; citation_pages: 1; 2; classification: Appeal rejected as untimely; director_findings: The Texas Service Center initially approved the petition but later revoked approval after a notice of intent to revoke. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Appeal rejected as untimely filed.', 'basis': 'The appeal was filed 90 days after the revocation decision; the notice’s erroneous statement of 33 days did not extend the regulatory 15-day period, and the filing did not satisfy motion requirements.', 'citation_pages': [1, 2]} |
Final-merits status | Not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {‘fit’: ‘Appeal rejected as untimely’, ‘aggregation_valid’: True, ‘use’: ‘Procedural aggregation only with late appeal rejections; preserve the different service, receipt, filing-fee, revocation, and motion-conversion circumstances. Do not blend revocation appeal deadlines with ordinary denial appeals without explaining the difference.’, ‘do_not_claim’: [‘Do not characterize a procedural rejection, dismissal, or remand as completed merits adjudication.’, ‘Do not infer individual criterion findings from aggregate threshold statements.’, ‘Do not treat remand as approval.’, ‘Do not treat a nonprecedent decision as binding authority.’], ‘caveat’: ‘The AAO decided timeliness, not the underlying EB-1A criteria or final merits.’}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Threshold research
Final Merits research
Untimely research
Remand research
Revocation research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.