AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision MAR272023_01B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision MAR272023_01B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision MAR272023_01B2203: dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision MAR272023_01B2203: dismissed. The AAO agreed the leading/critical-role criterion was met, but rejected the award and published-material claims. It did not reach the petitioner’s reserved acclaim arguments because fewer than three criteria were established.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: Complete EB-1A AAO decision or related proceeding reviewed from assigned source PDF; no publication or CMS changes.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

MAR272023_01B2203

Decision date as printed

2023-03-27

Classification / field stated in source

Nonprecedent AAO EB-1A appellate or related proceeding

Procedural posture

Appeal of Texas Service Center denial of Form I-140 EB-1A petition.

Operative disposition

dismissed

Final-merits status

Not reached; fewer than three criteria established.

What the AAO decision addressed

The AAO agreed the leading/critical-role criterion was met, but rejected the award and published-material claims. It did not reach the petitioner’s reserved acclaim arguments because fewer than three criteria were established.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not met — p. 3

Membership

Not considered — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not met — p. 3, p. 4

Judging the work of others

Not considered — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not considered — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not considered — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not considered — p. 2

Leading or critical role

met — p. 2

High salary or remuneration

Not considered — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The AAO agreed the leading/critical-role criterion was met, but rejected the award and published-material claims. It did not reach the petitioner’s reserved acclaim arguments because fewer than three criteria were established.; pages: 2; 6

  • claim: Decision date, caption/classification and field verified from the source PDF.; pages: 1

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: caveats: Nonprecedent decision; published-material and awards analysis turns on the claimed field being soccer coach, not player.; eligible_for_aggregation: True; eligible_for_individual_decision_page: True; reason: Sports-coach comparison on leadership evidence versus awards received as a player and media coverage in the claimed coaching field.; recommended_use: A source-cited decision page or tightly scoped aggregation preserving date, field, procedural posture, exact criterion states and whether final merits was reached.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Athletics sector research

  • Final Merits research

  • Coverage research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for MAR272023_01B2203