AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision MAR262021_02B2203: dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision MAR262021_02B2203: dismissed. The petitioner established authorship and leading/critical role, but the awards, published-material, judging, and display claims did not establish three criteria.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: Complete AAO decision addressing an EB-1A Form I-140 extraordinary-ability petition.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAR262021_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2021-03-26 |
Classification / field stated in source | AAO EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition decision or motion proceeding |
Procedural posture | Appeal of Texas Service Center denial of a Form I-140 EB-1A petition; appeal dismissed after finding fewer than three criteria. |
Operative disposition | dismissed |
Final-merits status | The AAO found fewer than three criteria and stated final merits need not be reached. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The petitioner established authorship and leading/critical role, but the awards, published-material, judging, and display claims did not establish three criteria.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | |
Membership | Not considered — source PDF |
Published material about the person | |
Judging the work of others | Not met — p. 4 |
Original contributions of major significance | Not considered — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | met — p. 5 |
Artistic display or showcases | |
Leading or critical role | |
High salary or remuneration | Not considered — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The petitioner was a journalist; the AAO withdrew the Director’s findings on awards, published material, and judging, while agreeing authorship and leading/critical-role criteria remained met. (pp. 1–2, 4–6); pages: 1; 2; 4; 5; 6
claim: The AAO found the National Rails Award was not nationally/internationally recognized for excellence in journalism; most coverage concerned railway systems or swimming, not the petitioner’s work as a journalist. (pp. 2–5); pages: 2; 3; 4; 5
claim: The AAO found fewer than three criteria and dismissed; it did not reach final merits. (pp. 5–6); pages: 5; 6
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Threshold research
Final Merits research
Coverage research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.