AAO research
EB-1A appeal arguments — AAO decision MAR262013_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision MAR262013_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAR262013_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2013-03-26 |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: Appeal dismissed for lack of specific error. The Director’s final-merits denial remained; AAO did not independently reweigh criteria or final merits.; citation_pages: 2; 3; classification: appeal_summarily_dismissed_no_specific_error; director_findings: Texas Service Center denied. The Director found the petitioner met the plain-language requirements of at least three criteria but failed to establish sustained acclaim/final merits. Counsel’s appeal stated only that the petitioner met all requirements despite denial; although a brief was promised, none arrived after about three months. AAO summarily dismissed because counsel did not identify any specific erroneous conclusion of law or fact. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Appeal dismissed.', 'basis': 'The appeal made a general claim that all requirements were met without challenging the Director’s specific final-merits findings; no promised brief followed.', 'citation_pages': [2, 3]} |
Final-merits status | director_Not met_AAO_Not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {'fit': 'final_merits_initial_threshold_and_appeal_specificity', 'aggregation_valid': True, 'use': 'Useful source-cited illustration of the distinction between meeting three initial criteria and failing the final-merits test, coupled with appeal specificity requirements.', 'do_not_claim': ['Do not characterize a procedural dismissal, rejection, or remand as approval or a completed merits adjudication.', 'Do not infer criteria outcomes beyond those expressly stated.', 'Do not treat explicitly nonprecedent decisions as binding authority.'], 'caveat': 'Use only the cited holding; this decision does not support broader conclusions than described.'}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Threshold research
Final Merits research
Remand research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.