AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision MAR262013_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision MAR262013_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. The display criterion was met, while the other discussed criteria were not; the AAO found the antecedent three-criteria threshold unmet. (pp. 4–11).
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | MAR262013_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | March 26, 2013 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A petition in fine arts; petitioner was a painter. (pp. 1, 5) |
Procedural posture | Appeal of service-center denial; AAO dismissed. (pp. 1, 12) |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed. |
Final-merits status | The AAO found the three-criterion threshold unmet; it did not conduct a separate final-merits determination in this decision. (p. 11) |
What the AAO decision addressed
The display criterion was met, while the other discussed criteria were not; the AAO found the antecedent three-criteria threshold unmet. (pp. 4–11)
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | not met |
Membership | Not coded — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not met — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | not met |
Original contributions of major significance | Not met — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not coded — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | not met |
High salary or remuneration | Not coded — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not met — source PDF |
Source holds and limits
No source identity/completeness hold.
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: If editorially cleared, create a source-linked summary that identifies posture and disposition, separates threshold-stage criteria from any aggregate/final-merits reasoning, and includes page-specific PDF citations. Narrow comparison for visual-artist display evidence and limits of applying performing-arts commercial-success criterion to painting; fact-bound.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Judging the work of others research
Leading or critical role research
Performance sector research
Threshold research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.