AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision MAR242016_01B2203: Appeal arguments

AAO EB-1A decision MAR242016_01B2203: Appeal arguments

EB-1A appeal arguments — AAO decision MAR242016_01B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed under 8 C.F.R. §103.3(a)(1)(v). Review source status, procedural…

Decision summary: AAO decision MAR242016_01B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed under 8 C.F.R. §103.3(a)(1)(v). AAO states that absent a specific error, filing Form I-290B alone does not trigger analysis of the criteria or review of the Director’s decision.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_nonprecedent_AAO_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

MAR242016_01B2203

Decision date as printed

March 24, 2016

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A Form I-140; extraordinary ability; petitioner identified as a periodontist; Matter of R-J-; non-precedent AAO decision

Procedural posture

Appeal from Nebraska Service Center denial. Form I-290B and accompanying letter promised a brief within 30 days but did not identify grounds; no supplement was filed more than seven months after July 2015 appeal.

Operative disposition

Appeal summarily dismissed under 8 C.F.R. §103.3(a)(1)(v).

Final-merits status

Not reached

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO states that absent a specific error, filing Form I-290B alone does not trigger analysis of the criteria or review of the Director’s decision.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached
The AAO disposition was procedural and did not decide this criterion. — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached
The AAO disposition was procedural and did not decide this criterion. — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached
The AAO disposition was procedural and did not decide this criterion. — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached
The AAO disposition was procedural and did not decide this criterion. — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not reached
The AAO disposition was procedural and did not decide this criterion. — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached
The AAO disposition was procedural and did not decide this criterion. — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not reached
The AAO disposition was procedural and did not decide this criterion. — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached
The AAO disposition was procedural and did not decide this criterion. — source PDF

Source holds and limits

["The decisions are separate records and must be cited independently.", "The AAO expressly labels this decision non-precedent."]

Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer

  • The decisions are separate records and must be cited independently.

  • The AAO expressly labels this decision non-precedent.

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The source identifies an AAO decision dated March 24, 2016.; pages: 1

  • claim: The petition or motion classification is described as: EB-1A Form I-140; extraordinary ability; petitioner identified as a periodontist; Matter of R-J-; non-precedent AAO decision.; pages: 1

  • claim: Appeal from Nebraska Service Center denial. Form I-290B and accompanying letter promised a brief within 30 days but did not identify grounds; no supplement was filed more than seven months after July 2015 appeal.; pages: 1

  • claim: AAO states that absent a specific error, filing Form I-290B alone does not trigger analysis of the criteria or review of the Director’s decision.; pages: 1

  • claim: Operative order: Appeal summarily dismissed under 8 C.F.R. §103.3(a)(1)(v).; pages: 1

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: narrow_procedural_explainer_only

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Membership research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Summary Dismissal research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for MAR242016_01B2203