AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision MAR232022_01B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision MAR232022_01B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision MAR232022_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed AAO found one top-level competition award met, but membership, published material, and original contributions were not established. The additional leading/critical-role claim and prospective-benefit issue were reserved.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: The source is an AAO EB-1A petition appeal and contains decision-specific procedural and evidentiary analysis.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

MAR232022_01B2203

Decision date as printed

March 23, 2022

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition appeal

Procedural posture

EB-1A appeal; dismissed after fewer than three criteria; formal final merits not reached.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

AAO expressly declined formal final merits because the initial threshold failed; aggregate no-acclaim observations followed.

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO found one top-level competition award met, but membership, published material, and original contributions were not established. The additional leading/critical-role claim and prospective-benefit issue were reserved.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

met — p. 2, p. 3

Membership

Not met — p. 3, p. 4

Published material about the person

Not met — p. 4, p. 5

Judging the work of others

Not coded — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 5, p. 6

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached — p. 6

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The public decision redacts the sport name; it describes a male athlete/coach with regional, national, and international competition placements who intended to compete and open a training academy in the United States.; pages: 1; 2

  • claim: The AAO found a third-place trophy at a 2014 top-level world competition sufficient for the awards criterion; a 2011 fourth-place result did not itself show receipt of an award.; pages: 2; 3

  • claim: Association bylaws showed athlete membership required an application/registration statement rather than outstanding achievements judged by experts; other alleged association membership was not established.; pages: 3; 4

  • claim: Competition-result lists and screenshots/videos did not establish qualifying published material about the petitioner; descriptions of video content lacked supporting transcripts.; pages: 4; 5

  • claim: The petitioner’s club/training work and athletic results did not demonstrate original contributions of major significance or field-wide influence.; pages: 5; 6

  • claim: AAO reserved the leading/critical-role and prospective-benefit issues, found fewer than three criteria, and dismissed without formal final merits.; pages: 6; 7

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Athletics sector research

  • Final Merits research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for MAR232022_01B2203